Students used to be a militant bunch. Remember the Kent
State massacre of 1970? Although only four years old at the time, I know what
happened. US National Guardsmen shot dead four innocent students and wounded
nine others during a mass protest against the American invasion of Cambodia
(Figure 51.1). The military operation, conducted on the opposite side of the
globe, did not disadvantage any of the protesters personally, but that was
immaterial. The students could see the wider picture, and their activism
stemmed not from expediency or self-interest, but from steadfast moral
principle. Tragic though the outcome was, a clear message was sent to the White
House: millions of young people disagreed with foreign policy, and they would
not stand to have their intelligence insulted.
Figure
51.1: A student protester lies wounded at Kent State University, Ohio on 4th
May, 1970.
Copyright
© 2012 Bettman/CORBIS
British
undergraduates, too, have a proud history of passionate student activism. When
I (crash-) landed at university in the mid-eighties, the campus was bursting
with (mainly left-wing) firebrands, all spitting bricks at injustices real or
merely perceived. Those were the days of Live Aid, Thatcherism, CND, violent Irish
republicanism and London street riots. There was plenty to shout about,
whatever one’s views (Figure 51.2).
Figure
51.2: Every one of these lapel badges was familiar to 1980s’ students.
Copyright
© 2012 London Metropolitan University
As
things were then, so they are today. Individual issues come and go, but
fundamental politics is as much a corruption of human ethics as ever. In
Britain alone, the debt crisis threatens to impoverish future generations; and
the corrupt, profligate, anti-democratic European Union is succeeding in
destroying hard-won self-determination where Hitler failed – and without a single
shot needing to be fired. The likes of Mahatma Gandhi, Apostolos Santas and
Nelson Mandela were prepared to sacrifice their lives in the name of
representative self-government; and yet, today, the British people relinquish basic
liberties to a foreign power with their brains switched off and eyes tight shut.
Why,
then, when standing so close to the precipice, are today’s students silent?
With the exception of a half-baked objection to education funding cuts in 2010,
there has been barely a squeak of dissent from British campuses. What has
changed?
Forty
years ago, only 5% of British school-leavers attended university. The present figure
is close to 40%, despite students being demonstrably no more capable.
Consequently, if the drop-out rate is not to rocket, academic standards must be
lowered. Furthermore, extra funding, on a massive scale, becomes urgent. Given
the unprecedented level of public debt, there is no chance of such costs being
met by the taxpayer. 21st-century students are obliged to pay their own tuition
fees, inevitably by means of (subsidized) loans. Anyone quitting prematurely
leaves higher education with an unsettled loan agreement instead of a degree
certificate. Reminiscent of the brainless commitment to mixed-ability teaching
in British schools in the 1960s and 70s, the most able undergraduates spend
half their time freewheeling, while the least able – a whopping 9% – play out a
twelve-month stay of execution prior to being thrown out, debt-ridden and
demoralized.
As
a result of ‘dumbing down’, today’s students are not only, on average, less
intellectually astute than those of previous generations but, also, far less politically aware.
How do I know? Well, I completed two university stints – 1985-9 and 2006-9 –
and feel well qualified to judge the difference. ‘Uni’ has become a comfortable
rite of passage, more social than educational. During my second course,
whenever I entered the campus library, the majority of its occupants seemed
more concerned with social networking than with cerebral endeavour. Political
activism did not even register, which struck me as ironic, as Facebook is a godsend to any parties
aiming to orchestrate mass action.
So
I ask: why are so many young people now being encouraged to attend university
at all? Is it to prevent unemployment figures going stratospheric, thereby
reflecting adversely on politicians? Perhaps it is. Back in the 1950s, millions
of British school-leavers were paid to complete apprenticeships. Today, it is
largely the reverse: in order to equip themselves, both intellectually and
vocationally, teenagers are made to pay one institution with a vast sum of
money borrowed from another. The debt mountain thus grows and grows, and, of
course, the taxpayers of tomorrow are the students of today. Former U.S. president
Herbert Hoover (1874-1964), paraphrasing Matthew
5:5, foretold the future thus:
‘Blessed
are the young, for they shall inherit the national debt.’
That
was 1936. The difference between then and now is that today’s apathetic students
dwell in ignorance and sink into debt as the terms of their future subjugation
are set in stone outside their own land (Figure 50.3).
Figure
51.3: More and more commentators now refer to the EU as the ‘Fourth Reich’.
Copyright
© 2012 Nikone Le Fou
Come
on, students, spit bricks – if you still know how.
Copyright
© 2012 Paul Spradbery
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.