A dear friend of mine passed away several weeks
ago. His cancer had been diagnosed only in March of this year, so it seemed
merciful that his suffering was not further prolonged. His wife – they had been
together for fifteen years – was, and remains, distraught, and turned to me to
sort out all the financial matters and laborious paperwork.
Most of it has been straightforward. Only one
matter has caused difficulty, having me sad one minute, raging the next. The
two of them bought a timeshare several years ago from what she assured me was a
‘reputable timeshare company’. A blatant contradiction in terms, you might be
thinking. Over the past decade, they enjoyed all-season holidays in Andalucía,
and I suppose they always tried to make the best of a dubious deal. What I did
not know is that, after they had received the tragic prognosis from the
hospital, they were approached by a ‘seemingly legitimate’ firm offering to
sell the timeshare for them – and it already had a potential buyer. The firm
demanded €600 up front;
but the alarm bells failed to ring. No proper selling agent either expects,
less still demands, payment prior to completion. It was, of course, a simple scam.
The ‘business’ was found to have operated from false addresses, and its owners
will by now have disappeared into the night. I learned of it only after my
friend’s death. He was a gentle soul, always giving others the benefit of the
doubt (Figure 63.1).
Figure 63.1:
My friend’s lack of cynicism was his Achilles’ heel.
Copyright ©
2013 Demand Media Inc.
Shortly after the funeral, his wife – I dislike the
word ‘widow’ – told me that she had been contacted by a Spanish law firm
investigating timeshare fraud, and that it would apparently cost nothing for
them to pursue the matter on her behalf. I collected the entire documentation
last week but, before I had found time to digest it, she had been contacted
several more times by the ‘fraud-busters’. Each time, however, she explained to
them that I would be dealing with all matters henceforth.
My first reaction was that lawyers do not come
free, nor cheap, nor anything other than ludicrously, unjustifiably expensive. (The
old joke that they do not look out of their office windows in the mornings
because it gives them something to do in the afternoons does hold an element of
truth – and yes, I have worked for a law firm.) Secondly, given Data Protection
legislation, how did they find everything out? Thirdly, such cold-calling is
illegal under Spanish Law.
So I phoned the firm, which is based in Málaga, and
spoke with the person responsible. As I suspected, only the initial
consultation was free. There would be a €1000 retainer; costs would pile up in typical lawyerly fashion; and,
naturally, there would be a less than perfect chance of recovering any money. I
told them cold-calling was illegal and threatened to report them to the Consejo General de la Abogacía Española (Spanish
Law Society). There has not been a squeak from them since.
Sadly, there was more to come, from yet another
cold-caller with my friend’s details from heaven-knows-where. This time I shall
name the company. It is Milestone Data,
supposedly based in London. I checked the address they provided: 145-157, St John Street, EC1V 4PY. This is registered to a company
called London Presence, a (presumably)
legitimate business which, for as little as £15 per month, provides
mail-redirection services to clients who are, self-evidently, nowhere near
London. Furthermore, Milestone Data is
not registered at Companies House. (This is the British government’s Registrar
of Companies which requires, by law, annual submissions, all of which are made publicly
available.) I told them, in no uncertain terms, to back off.
Something else has since occurred to me. If a
client has been tricked once, cold-callers with inside information would
logically assume that he or she might fall for a follow-up ‘double-dip’ scam,
particularly if the second firm offers to track down the first set of crooks
and make them pay, on the basis of ‘your enemy’s enemy is your friend’. Such a premise
is dangerously unsound. Moreover, who is to say that the first scammer and the
second are not in cahoots, or even one and the same?
My friend belonged to a different age. His wife can scarcely believe the unlawful depths which fellow humans will plumb in the name of financial gain. They were a good match, both born way after their time to a world becoming increasingly devious, and shameless, in its criminality. I do not expect it to improve (Figure 63.2).
Figure 63.2: El escritor escribiendo. So
long, MMB. I shall keep my word.
Copyright ©
2013 Paul Spradbery
Copyright © 2013 Paul Spradbery
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.