It has been pointed out to me that this is only the second article of this year. No, I am
not stuck for something to write, nor losing interest in doing so. The previous
article, 9/11: The Silent Witnesses, prompted a larger email response than
all my other 118 articles combined, and I have spent hours, week after week
since January, answering questions and exchanging views and ideas with people
from across the world, mainly the USA. Being British, I suppose it was
inevitable that some correspondents would raise the subject of the so-called ‘7/7’
bombings, which took place in London in 2005, asking whether I believed this to
have been a similar ‘false flag’ event. Very well; I’ll bite. Having seen some of the forensic evidence, it is clear that 7/7 was an inside job, but I would prefer to summarize my case another
day.
I
should like, instead, to refer back to Article 96, which I compiled on 21st June, 2016, just two days prior to the UK’s referendum on whether it should
leave or remain in the EU. Having been a ‘Eurosceptic’ since my student days (see Article
31), I unhesitatingly voted Leave. When the result was announced, on the 24th,
pleasing though it was, I reckoned that the battle to break free from EU authority had only just begun – and it would inevitably be long, uphill, into the
wind and conceivably bloody.
The
decisive Leave victory was an eye-watering kick in the balls for the British
Establishment. Since 1993, when the EU came into being, following the Maastricht
Treaty (1992), all major political parties in the UK have been its willing
puppets. True, the Conservative party’s grassroots have since been strongly
Eurosceptic, but its post-Maastricht prime ministers, Major (1992-7) and
Cameron (2010-6), passively accepted EU diktat. The Conservatives’ mantra, ‘in
Europe, but not run by Europe’, was never more than a disingenuous sop to its
increasingly anti-EU rank and file.
Before
the political dam threatened to break, Cameron offered an ‘in-or-out’
referendum to the British people, having assumed that, however strongly Eurosceptic
we had become, inertia would prevail and we would never summon the courage to vote to leave. Despite
Cameron’s (taxpayer-funded) propaganda (Figure 120.1), deservedly dismissed as ‘Project
Fear’, but delivered to every British home prior to the poll, his gamble
backfired. Cameron resigned as prime minister the next day, but the
Establishment’s efforts to reverse the people’s decision began immediately
thereafter.
Figure 120.1: This infamous leaflet was the
centrepiece of the Cameron government’s shameless propaganda drive, designed
to convince the British people that a Leave vote would unleash immediate
economic catastrophe. None of it has come to pass.
Crown Copyright © 2016
Step
One was to install another pro-EU stooge as Cameron’s replacement. Enter, without
even a party ballot, the inept Theresa May, a remainer masquerading to the
nation as a Brexiteer (Figure 120.2). Whether a consequence of her innate stupidity,
or something even less forgivable – perfidiousness – ‘Theresa the Appeaser’ offered
near-limitless concessions to the EU’s grateful negotiators and did her best to
serve up the UK’s sovereignty and national interests on a Brexit-shaped plate. The ‘deal’
that she presented to her Cabinet, and subsequently Parliament, had been
prepared word-for-word by the unelected EU Commission, and was arguably the most
one-sided international document – a treaty, in fact – since Versailles (1919)
(Figure 120.3).
Figure 120.2: (Former) Prime Minister Theresa May,
flanked by other hardline Remainers, David Lidington (left) and Philip Hammond
(right), epitomized intellectual dishonesty by doing everything possible to
stymie the very policy (Brexit) that they had been elected to implement.
Copyright © 2019 BBC
Figure 120.3: Greek politician Yanis
Varoufakis (1961-), who has first-hand experience in dealing with the EU,
described Theresa May’s ‘deal’ as something that ‘a nation signs only after
having been defeated at war’.
Copyright © 2019 Guardian News and Media Ltd
By
serendipity more than anything else, Parliament rejected the execrable offering
three times. Had the imbecilic May not botched her 2017 General Election
campaign, resulting in a ‘hung’ (non-majority) parliament, her inescapable ‘Surrender
Treaty’ might now be in effect.
After
three years spent deviously striving to thrust a humiliating ‘Brexit-in-name-only’
onto the British people, the stroppy, self-pitying May was belatedly booted out
of office.
Her
replacement, Boris Johnson, was elected by the party members, but only after he
had promised unequivocally that the UK would leave the EU, come what may, last week.
Not only did Johnson break his word into 17,410,742 pieces, but he had the
audacity to re-present the bulk of May’s abominable agreement and advocate its
immediate acceptance. Parliament, mercifully, saw through his outrageous
deception, rejected it and agreed to another General Election, to be held next month.
Three-and-a-half
years have passed since we voted to leave the EU. Our parliamentary representatives have spent that entire time trying to prostrate the country at the feet of an unaccountable
foreign bureaucracy, while simultaneously claiming that they are respecting democratic
public will and reasserting national independence.
Of
all the political parties contesting next month’s poll, only one respects the outcome of the largest democratic exercise ever conducted in British history.
It is the Brexit Party, led by Nigel Farage. All the others – Conservative, Labour,
Scottish Nationalist, Welsh Nationalist, Green, Monster Raving Loony and
Liberal Democrats – are mere Establishment tools who believe that British
sovereignty should be sacrificed to a corrupt, antidemocratic supranational regime
which calls itself ‘The European Union’.
Vote
Brexit Party on 12th December (Figure 120.4).
Figure 120.4: The link below references Boris Johnson’s ‘Surrender Treaty 2.0’. Its potential consequences
should alarm all self-respecting Brits.
Copyright © 2019 The Brexit Party Ltd
Copyright
© 2019 Paul Spradbery
