I See You, Mr Gates

Given the number of articles published this month, it would be easy to conclude that I am stuck at home with surplus spare time. Not so; I am beavering away for forty or so hours every week in a research facility and enjoying it. The reason for the recent batch of corona-posts is that I have struggled to make complete sense of the whole picture. Too many factors do not add up. I have felt for a while that something unidentified was staring me in the face, and an unsolved puzzle is a red rag. My initial beliefs were that SARS-CoV-2 is a bio-engineered entity; valid scientific data are being censored; world economic collapse, although inevitable, is being systematically engineered; and government politicians and their lackeys are inflating mortality data to fit an ulterior agenda. Nothing that I have learned or witnessed this month makes me doubt that these disconcerting conclusions are correct.

Even so, one or two crucial pieces of the jigsaw are missing. What are they? Why, at daily press conferences, do politicians and medical/scientific advisers trumpet such transparent propaganda? They speak like robots and behave like puppets, as if each straight-bat response is pre-programmed. Who is pushing the agenda? Who or what is the eminence grise? Who is the programmer?

Please follow my logic, but feel free to stop reading if you believe it to be too fantastic. Every day, we are told repeatedly that government decisions are being ‘guided by science’. This is a convenient deceit. It means: (a) no one can, therefore, blame the government for the disastrous effects of the lockdown; and (b) the public is not qualified to doubt either the veracity of science or the integrity of scientists. It is designed to give politicians plausible deniability.

Distraction is another propagandist’s tool. Much is made of the tireless commitment undertaken by health service workers, even to the extent of encouraging millions of people to stand outside their homes once a week and clap their hands like performing seals. There is also a (marvellous) 99-year-old military veteran who has raised millions of pounds by walking in his garden. The government is only too happy for him to become a focus of national attention, and for the public to think with heart rather than head.

We are told repeatedly — constant repetition is another tell-tale sign of propaganda — that the only way out of this unprecedented social control is a vaccine. This is yet another lie. Hydroxychloroquine has been a useful drug for decades. Most recently, in France, patients diagnosed as having COVID-19 have been treated with hydroxychloroquine, and results have been encouraging (Devaux et al., 2020; Gautret et al., 2020). Yet, government officials make lame, narrow-minded excuses, namely that it is not effective in every case, and that side-effects have been observed. Only a vaccine will do, they insist. In the meantime, people die unnecessarily. (Given the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine, does this not warrant further clinical trials? What side-effect is worse than death?)

Now for the intriguing part. A worldwide vaccine is the brainchild of Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates, despite the fact that he has neither been elected nor does he possess any medical qualifications. At Event 2O1, held last autumn, he, in collaboration with Baltimore’s Johns Hopkins University, war-gamed a coronavirus pandemic, with a view to funding a universal vaccination programme (Figure 131.1). The COVID-19 saga occurred within weeks of the conference. Coincidence?

Figure 132.1: After initial incredulity, I am beginning to wonder whether the pandemic really was a result of laboratory negligence. (I would remind any coincidence theorists that both the 9/11 and 7/7 atrocities were also war-gamed, with uncanny precision, the latter involving the very same three Tube stations at which the bombs subsequently exploded.)

Copyright © 2019 Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security

Now consider Bill Gates’s modus operandi. He obtains a licence, makes simple copies of something in vast quantities, and sells them to a captive world market. His riches have enabled him to fund academics, including government adviser Professor Neil Ferguson, of Imperial College, London, a discredited epidemiologist whose predictions for previous microbial outbreaks were criminally inaccurate, and also Professor Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer, who misleads the public via daily television broadcasts. Conflict of interests here is staggering.

The Secretary of State for Health, a condescending fifth-rater called Matt Hancock, has made several references to the idea of immunity certificates for those who have supposedly recovered from COVID-19. He is careful not to define the word ‘certificate’. Gates is a firm proponent of ‘certificates’, too. His preferred type is a digital ID — see id2020.org — similar to a micro-chip implanted into a domestic dog. I wonder who Gates has in mind to own the licence for the worldwide imposition of such a draconian system.

Of course, viral immunity is not everlasting, so digital IDs would require the expense of Microsoft-style upgrades on a regular and perpetual basis. It could be argued that the intent of such invasive technology is benign enough. That, however, is not the point. Intent can change once the system has been implemented. The disturbing aspect is its scope. Digital IDs could also be employed, for example, to control bank credits and debits in a cashless world, where an individual’s funds could be sequestrated or suspended at the will of either bank or State, and for whatever reason. With no medium of independent exchange — i.e. physical cash — financial transactions (as well as vaccination status and all other personal data) could be monitored by Big Brother. Those not conforming to social controls, such as political dissidents, or anyone refusing to be chipped, could be made persona non grata at the click of a mouse (Figure 131.2). It is true that forced or coerced vaccination would breach the Nuremburg Code (1947), so would be unacceptable. However, if remaining ‘unchipped’ were to be made socially and economically intolerable, then resistance could be overwhelmed.

Figure 132.2: Despite being an atheist, I shall quote the Bible:

Revelation 13: 17

‘And the second beast required all people small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark — the name of the beast or the number of its name.’

Copyright © 2011 Reuters

Far-fetched? Well, if governments were being open and straightforward, then lies, propaganda and scientific censorship would surely be superfluous, would they not?

Gates is one of the missing jigsaw pieces. Philanthropist or megalomaniac?

Copyright © 2020 Paul Spradbery

Devaux, C. A., Rolain, J. M., Colson, P., & Raoult, D. (2020). New insights on the antiviral effects of chloroquine against coronavirus: what to expect for COVID-19? International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 105938. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105938

Gautret, P., Lagier, J. C., Parola, P., Hoang, V. T., Meddeb, L., Mailhe, M., Doudier, B., Courjon, J., Giordanengo, V., Vieira, V. E., Dupont, H. T., Honoré, S., Colson, P., Chabrière, E., La Scola, B., Rolain, J. M., Brouqui, P., & Raoult, D. (2020). Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 105949. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949