Eight years ago, I was approached by the Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education, asking whether I would be willing to serve as a professional adviser regarding government-funded biological research (Figure 147.1). I accepted the offer almost immediately, and have been happy to serve ever since, in which time I have come to know a good number of first-rate Portuguese scientists, mainly in the fields of forensic biology and biochemistry.
Copyright © 2012 Paul Spradbery
Since COVID first reared its fraudulent head, at the beginning of this year, communications between us, generally emails, have been incessant. We are all aware that, although a ‘novel’ coronavirus (0.3% different from SARS-CoV-1) did emerge, the infection fatality rate (IFR) is way too low for COVID to be legitimately termed a pandemic. Worldwide, the current IFR is, according to the world’s leading epidemiologist, Dr John Ioannidis of Stanford University, a mere 0.14%, which is nowhere near statistically significant.
The principal aspect of the COVID saga to raise our hackles is the fact that the laboratory test for SARS-CoV-2 is fundamentally unsuitable. As I pointed out in Article 141, written six weeks ago, the false-positive rate is far too high for the test to be valid. In fact, after having recently studied the original analytical protocol, it is beyond doubt that the test was designed deliberately to inflate the proportion of positive tests to an absurd degree. The false-positive rate is a staggering 90%. Why, then, we must ask, would the World Health Organization’s advisers engineer such a brazen deception?
Eleven days ago, the Portuguese Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa (Court of Appeal of Lisbon) (Figure 147.2) heard a testimony from several scientists, one of whom I know well, and concluded that the test was entirely unreliable, and that any subsequent enforced quarantine measures are unlawful. The original (Portuguese) text of the Court judgement can be found at:
http://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/79d6ba338dcbe5e28025861f003e7b30
The English translation is available at:
This ruling (Figure 147.3) is a huge blow to all governments that are destroying lives and livelihoods by means of lockdowns and other draconian restrictions. Conversely, it will serve as a boon to Dr Reiner Fuellmich (see Article 142), who will certainly cite this case in his class action lawsuits which are about to be presented to American and Canadian courts.
Copyright © 2020 Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa
There has, predictably, been no mention of the case outcome by any mainstream media. Furthermore, the reddit website removed the information, stating – incredibly – that the official Court of Appeal documentation was an unreliable source. This is but the latest in a long catalogue of counternarrative facts erased from social media. Even Professor Michael Levitt, Winner of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2013, and the world’s most quoted living scientist, had a video interview hastily removed from the internet just a fortnight ago.
Despite desperate efforts from crooked mainstream media, the truth behind ‘The Great COVID Hoax’ is leaking out through more and more outlets. Public scepticism is growing. Throughout Europe, regular protests are becoming larger and more violent. Corrupt politicians and their advisers must realize that, once public anger reaches a critical volume, retribution will follow – in one form or another.
Copyright © 2020 Paul Spradbery
