Longing To Be Wrong

Two centuries ago, the German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831) (Figure 150.1) introduced a logical concept known since as the Hegelian Dialectic.

Figure 150.1: Georg Hegel wrote: ‘To him who looks at the world rationally the world looks rationally back.’

Copyright expired

Last week, I came across a dog-eared old photograph. Taken in the early summer of 1982, it shows my beloved pet dog (1971-83), a smooth-haired fox terrier, lying on the back lawn. At the time, I was home alone, (supposedly) revising for school exams. Some mornings, if the weather was fine, I would tie one end of a light two-metre chain to the dog’s collar and the other to the pole of a rotary washing line. There, he would have sufficient freedom to move about within a circle with an approximate area of 12.5 square metres, with his chain, if fully extended, forming the circle’s radius (π × r-squared and all that). Most of the time, as I sat outside, reading, he would be content to lie in the sun, sniffing the breeze, moving only occasionally to drink from his water bowl.

I digress before I even begin. What links Hegel to my old dog?

The past twelve months of everyone’s life have been dominated by the so-called ‘pandemic’. This is despite the fact that, as yet, no causal link between the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the disease diagnosed as COVID-19 has been confirmed anywhere in the world. You read that right: the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated from a purified clinical sample taken from a COVID-19 patient. (If evidence does exist, then I challenge anyone to publish it and thereby prove me wrong.) Bear in mind, also, that, throughout 2020, there was no excess overall mortality, either in the UK or worldwide. Hence, there has been no pandemic.

Why is Hegel relevant? His famous dialectic may be constructed into three stages:

1. An artificial problem or threat is contrived, and the public convinced of its existence.

2. Government demands that the public sacrifices basic rights to combat the ‘problem’.

3. Government imposes a pre-planned ‘solution’ which would not normally be acceptable.

The Hegelian strategy offers government a means to a desired end, not by enforcement (read Orwell’s 1984) but by duping the public into wanting it (read Huxley’s Brave New World). In other words, force is replaced by fraud and brainwashing (Figure 150.2). Consider what has been taken from the people in just twelve months: freedom of movement and peaceful assembly, and, via mass media censorship, speech and expression. We are told to avoid each other, isolate even when healthy, and wear pointless masks. These freedoms would never have been relinquished so readily, if at all, unless circumstances could be perceived to have become life-threatening. Only two days ago, the UK government’s deceitful advisers warned of a ‘mutant strain’ of SARS-CoV-2. How melodramatic. When pressed, they claimed that the probability of increased virulence was a whopping 50% – i.e. they had no evidence. (In fact, the Law of Declining Virulence, established by the pioneering American microbiologist Theobald Smith (1900-80), tells us that increased lethality is yet another myth, as those advisers well know.) Hence, the ‘new variant’ is bullshit.

Figure 150.2: COVID-induced insanity is the true pandemic. Here, outside a supermarket, I do not know what is more absurd: the cat queueing two metres from the door or the woman standing two metres behind the cat.

Copyright unknown

Human liberty is balancing on a knife-edge. I outlined in Article 149 – The Digital Gulag – publicly-available plans for vaccination data to be stored as part of every individual’s digital ID. This explains the relentless, propagandized drive for universal vaccination, despite the probability of healthy individuals dying from acute respiratory disease remaining negligible. Anyone lacking the prescribed vaccination status, and thus outside State control, could be made persona non grata at the click of a mouse.

The pre-planned ‘new normal’ would be a world of universal surveillance and strict travel restrictions. (The UK government has already given away millions of pounds to companies developing so-called ‘freedom passes’.) There would also be no privacy and no independent means of monetary exchange, following the abolition of cash. The forthcoming central bank digital currency (CBDC) would be available only to those willing, or forced by poverty, to submit. Social and political resistance would be precluded via complete technocratic control by a tiny globalist minority. Furthermore, unless those in power were to relinquish it voluntarily, which would never happen, serfdom, this time, could be forever.

I am reminded of my tethered dog. Only when he lay still, passive and uninquisitive, was he unaware of his chains. Millions of people around the world, fraudulently haunted and terrified by ‘the virus’, are oblivious to the digital chains which already bear their names.

This way to the trains. This way to the showers.

Copyright © 2021 Paul Spradbery