Saturday, March 13, 2021

COVID-19: Online Censorship

Yesterday evening, I published Article 153. I woke up this morning to discover that the video contained therein, featuring trial lawyer Dr Reiner Fuellmich discussing the latest Corona Committee evidence, has been summarily erased. The reason? Any claims about COVID vaccinations that contradict the official narrative are prohibited (Figure 154.1). So much for freedom of expression. So much for the fact that the video and my accompanying notes are evidence-based.


Figure 154.1: YouTube is a privately-owned organization and is fully entitled to remove any content it does not like, and for whatever reason. This I concede. I am, however, left to wonder at its blanket suppression of counternarrative content and thus freedom of expression. This proves, therefore, that it is, above all else, a political organization with its own agenda.

Copyright © 2021 YouTube

No matter. Time for Plan B. The censored video can, for now, be found at:


My ten censored notes are listed in Article 153. Having been provoked, I shall provide ten more for good measure.

11. Big Pharma, politicians and mainstream media have deliberately called this gene therapy a vaccine, when, demonstrably, it is not. Should we trust bare-faced liars?

12. This novel treatment, even if safe, would provide minimal protection and only for short periods. It prevents neither infection nor transmission. The prospect of repeated shots has already been discussed by Big Pharma who would make vast sums of money on a regular and perpetual basis. Their strategy is, therefore, to transform entire populations, unnecessarily, into lifelong drug dependency.

13. There are not only simpler, cheaper treatment alternatives, but the human immune system is proven to be 99.9% effective in dealing with acute respiratory infections.

14. Politicians and their advisers have been exposed, repeatedly, as liars and purveyors of exaggerated statistics. Many of them are in conflict of interest with regard to Big Pharma and the Gates Foundation.

15. Those of us who are sceptical or critical of this treatment risk being censored, ostracized, threatened or fired from work. History shows that truth and morality are rarely on the side of the establishment.

16. If this treatment were transparently beneficial, there would be no need for constant mass media propaganda and insidious behaviour manipulation.

17. Big Pharma have an alarming history of products giving rise to mass serious adverse events, then covering up the truth. Have you ever heard of the Pandemrix scandal? If not, please look it up.

18. In many countries, including the UK, medical practitioners are paid per injection. They are, therefore, in conflict of interest and their advice is compromised.

19. Pfizer executives and board members have stated that they have not been injected with their own product, as it would be unfair to jump the queue. (I find this rather amusing.) Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla was prevented from entering Israel for being ‘unvaccinated’.

20. Government and mass media have extolled the supposed benefits of this novel treatment but never stressed the potential risks or debated the issue publicly with any of the eminent doctors and scientists who vehemently disagree with them.

Anyone who submits to this treatment is, in my view, either misinformed or just plain mad.

Copyright © 2021 Paul Spradbery

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.