2021 is becoming more sinister by the week. This week, the UK government announced that only ‘vaccinated’ individuals – i.e. human genetic experimentation subjects – should be permitted to enter social venues, such as theatres, sports arenas and even pubs. By armchair logic alone, this discriminatory law would make no sense. If the drug works, then the drugged are not at risk from the undrugged. If it does not work, then there is no reason for anyone to be injected with it in the first place. As I have said repeatedly, both the virus and its so-called ‘vaccine’ are Trojan horses. They are simply a devious means to implement a digital system of totalitarian social control (Figure 156.1), where only those with a State-approved QR code would be afforded basic human rights. This is unprecedented and ethically abhorrent.
Figure 156.1: The Great Reset
‘The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, re-imagine, and reset our world.’
‘You will own nothing, you will have no privacy, and you will be happy.’
Klaus Schwab (1938-), Founder and Executive Chairman of the
(non-democratic, privately-owned) World Economic Forum.
COVID appears to be have been an extremely convenient ‘accident’ for those who, although unelected, believe they have a God-given right to reset our world to their own liking.
Copyright © 2021 World Economic Forum
Scientific reasons not to accept any of these gene-based drugs are chilling. As predicted, deaths and serious side-effects, such as heart attacks and blindness, have already been reported, following injections. Health service workers are being pressurized into silence regarding serious adverse events and the COVID fraud in general (Figure 156.2).
Figure 156.2: Another brave health worker blows the whistle.
Copyright © 2021 Lordlangerz
Consequently, a group of doctors and scientists, from 24 countries, led by the eminent Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, submitted a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) a few weeks ago. I am proud to be one of its verified signatories (Figure 156.3).
Figure 156.3: An excerpt of verified signatories from a letter to the EMA, which is now publicly available at:
Copyright © 2021 Doctors for Covid Ethics
The letter demanded that all such gene-based therapies be withdrawn immediately. It requested assurances that due diligence had been given, relating particularly to whether standard research criteria had been satisfied. Unless substantive evidence were provided, the letter would be made public. Unfortunately, no such evidence has been made available by the EMA, so it must be concluded that it does not exist.
One of the main concerns, outlined succinctly by Professor Bhakdi, which I raised in Article 153 earlier this month, is the real risk of blood-clotting disorders. Put simply, it is likely that thrombocytes (platelets), whose function is to stem bleeding by forming a ‘clot’, will be stimulated to aggregate in small blood vessels, most dangerously in the brain, spinal cord and heart. This would lead to blood vessel occlusion (blockage), leading to oxygen depletion and permanent tissue damage. Moreover, given that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to platelets, thereby deactivating them in the blood, this will cause thrombocytopenia (low platelet count) and, subsequently, haemorrhagic strokes.
The letter also points out that these unlicensed gene therapies were approved only on the strict basis that an emergency existed. However, evidence shows that it did not exist. Neither the UK’s National Health Service nor its equivalent in other countries was at risk of being overwhelmed. (In many cases, lockdowns and other draconian measures were implemented when the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak was abating.)
The most striking paragraph, though, is this:
‘There are serious concerns ... that the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines by the EMA was premature and reckless, and that the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute “human experimentation”, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.’
I have tried to sound the alarm, particularly to family and friends, and also on this website. (There was no need to alert work colleagues, as they are all fellow scientists and harbour similar reservations.) Sadly, the overwhelming response has been either apathy or hostility. It wearies me that so many people have their heads buried immovably in the sand. Perhaps this is because the implications of reality are too unbearable. Still, having knowledge of serious risks and remaining silent would be morally indefensible on my part.
More welcome is that the letter, now permanently in the public domain, is prompting a positive response. Millions worldwide, however, have already rolled the dice and rolled up their sleeves. For them, there can, sadly, be no going back.
Copyright © 2021 Paul Spradbery
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.