When in early 2020 I saw corporate media video footage of Chinese people falling down in the streets, I sensed that something about the ‘COVID’ narrative did not stack up. After two years of rampant propaganda, none of it has since stacked up, and there has — what a surprise — been no further footage, from anywhere on Earth, of anyone else suddenly keeling over. Hmmm.
The scientific basis of the proclaimed ‘pandemic’ perplexed me equally, at least in the early days. Two years ago, I wrote:
‘On February 2nd, a research team from Delhi, India, led by Dr Prashant Pradhan, published some alarming findings. Investigating the molecular structure of SARS-CoV-2, it was discovered that its genetic sequence contained four insertions, related to HIV, that are absent in other coronaviruses.’
— Frankenstein’s Virus (Article 125, 28 Feb 2020)
Shortly after I had downloaded and puzzled for hours over Dr Pradhan’s findings, it became clear that his work would never see the light of day. The brakes on its publication were hastily applied and have yet to be removed. I knew, right then, that someone, somewhere, was terrified, not of the oft-quoted ‘COVID misinformation’, but of the bare truth.
The paper can still be read, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871, but it is accompanied by a superfluous, and somewhat hokey, disclaimer stating that it has not been peer-reviewed. Regardless, seeing no reason to doubt the veracity of Dr Pradhan’s work, the HIV connection plagued my mind ... until the truth began to emerge within the past couple of months. As the Victorian writer and physician Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859-1930) famously wrote: ‘Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.’
The truth, beyond all sensible doubt, is as follows. There is now unquestionable scientific evidence that the ‘COVID vaccines’ are causing widespread VACCINE-MEDIATED ACQUIRED IMMUNE-DEFICIENCY SYNDROME (vAIDS). It has been established since last year that these drugs destroy some types of T-lymphocyte (CD8) cells, which are vital in the prevention of infection and malignant disease (cancer), and also cause severe disruption to regulatory control of protein synthesis and so-called cancer surveillance. Click the Doctors For Covid Ethics image button (right) for a detailed explanation.
Here in the UK, the creepily-named Health Security Agency publishes a weekly Vaccine Surveillance Report (Figure 188.1), appertaining to four weeks’ ‘COVID’ data from ‘cases’, hospitalizations, and deaths by vaccination status.
Figure 188.1: Despite the term ‘case’ having been falsified to mean ‘positive PCR test’, where 97%+ are false-positive, the ‘case rates’ per 100,000 by ‘vaccination’ status for a sample week are represented in the graph above.
Copyright © 2022 UK Health Security Agency
It is clear from the graph that the ‘case’ rate per 100k is clearly lowest among the ‘unvaccinated’ population. This result is apparent, also, in previous months’ data.
More damningly still, the Vaccine Effectiveness value (Figure 188.2), as defined by none other than Pfizer, proves that the drugs have a strongly negative impact on immune function.
Figure 188.2: VE (%) = (U - V) / U
where:
VE = Vaccine Effectiveness
U = Unvaccinated Case Rate
V = Vaccinated Case Rate
Therefore:
e.g. For Double Vaccinated (18-80+ years): 1,846.38 – 5,226.1 / 1,846.38 = -183%
Therefore, mean Vaccine Effectiveness in England (Jan 2022) was -183%.
Copyright © 2022 UK Health Security Agency
The direct comparison of death rates between ‘vaccinated’ and ‘unvaccinated’, for the same month, provides undeniable proof of ‘vaccine’ harm (Figure 188.3).
Figure 188.3: This graph speaks for itself.
Copyright © 2022 UK Health Security Agency
As if that is not enough, the most recent research (Seneff, Nigh, Kyriakopoulos & McCullough, 2022) paints an even more grim picture. In addition to proven negative outcomes, such as myocarditis, DNA damage and increased production/formation of tumours, ever-stronger evidence is given regarding impaired immune function.
Returning to Dr Pradhan’s discovery of HIV gene sequences having been deliberately spliced into SARS-CoV-2, I am left to wonder about cause and effect. Do the genetic sequences of the ‘vaccines’ contain enough of the HIV virus to instigate an AIDS-like condition? If so, then this constitutes powerful evidence that the ‘vaccines’ should be considered bioweapons, designed to kill and maim. (The death rates from these ‘vaccines’ have already made them the most lethal drugs in history.)
In the 1980s, AIDS was broadcast to the world as a major health concern. Celebrity deaths, including those of Rock Hudson (1925-85), Liberace (1919-87) and Freddie Mercury (1945-91), ensured that this condition was never off the front pages of newspapers. It is now well known that many AIDS deaths were actually caused by the lethal drug azidothymidine (AZT). The not-so-hidden hand behind the advocacy of mass AZT medication was none other than the grotesque charlatan ‘Dr’ Anthony Fauci, who happens to be one of the main perpetrators of the ‘COVID’ fraud and a relentless pusher of its ‘vaccines’.
After being absent from mass media headlines for almost three decades, AIDS has, for some reason, reared its head again. Two days ago, His Royal Highness The Duke of Sussex (a. k. a. Prince Harry), a person of no discernible intellect, and even less common sense, advised everyone to ‘get tested’ and ‘know their status’. What does he know? What has he heard? There have also been recent media reports of a ‘super-mutant HIV strain’ supposedly identified in the Netherlands.
Given the lies and propaganda of the past two years, it seems more than plausible that the burgeoning explosion in acquired immune deficiency caused by the ‘COVID vaccines’ is about to be blamed on some specially-contrived bogeyman. Will the world be fooled again?
Copyright © 2022 Paul Spradbery
Reference
Seneff, S., Nigh, G., Kyriakopolous, A. M., & McCullough, P. A. (2022). Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357994624 doi: 10.22541/au.164276411.10570847/v1
