Sunday, April 17, 2022

‘COVID Vaccines’ ➞ Severe Cardiac Pathology

Throughout my teenage life – late 70s, early 80s – playing sport was probably the best part. Now, as a middle-aged father, my sporting enjoyment comes mainly from watching my two teenage sons do the same; although, for three years, my elder son and I played together for the same cricket team. The memories will long outlive all my post-match aches and pains.

Last week, I received an email from my elder son’s former rugby club. It contained a message from a government-funded agency regarding the introduction of cardiac health assessments for teenage sports players. It referred, admonitorily, to the heart attack suffered by Danish footballer Christian Eriksen during last year’s Euro 2020 tournament. This agency has recently begun to offer routine cardiac health advice and screening to all young sports players. Why now, we must ask? No such service has, to my knowledge, ever existed in the UK before, so what has prompted this expanded approach in recent months?

I reckon most (honest) people already know the answer to that. Hardly a day passes without there being some reference to a young athlete experiencing a heart attack or acute myo/peri-carditis, either during a competitive match or a training session. Unfortunately, some members of the public, even those claiming to be educated, have their heads buried, either down in the sand or up somewhere more personal. As soon as I mentioned the fact that almost one thousand (mainly young) athletes have suffered such tragic consequences since the ‘COVID’ injections were rolled out – https://goodsciencing.com/covid/athletes-suffer-cardiac-arrest-die-after-covid-shot – I was assured, by non-scientists, that, despite growing evidence, these largely untested drugs are perfectly safe. One respondent – a pharmacist, no less – boasted about having presided over 30,000 injections of such drugs, despite the fact that they had undergone a paltry three-and-a-half months of testing prior to worldwide administration. This reckless idiot has clearly never heard of thalidomide.

Corporate media, also, are doing their utmost to brainwash the public into believing that anything other than these drugs is responsible for the cardiac pathology epidemic in young people. This article (Figure 191.1) appeared yesterday.


Figure 191.1: Long Covid, short Covid, in-between Covid ... anything to distract millions of human guinea pigs from the truth about their ill-informed decisions to be injected, and have their children injected, with highly toxic novel drugs. I would wager that few such complaints are being made by the ‘unvaccinated’. Besides, cardiac pathology was not unusually prevalent until the drugs were rolled out. QED.

Copyright © 2022 Associated Newspapers Ltd

Fortunately, however, the truth is being acknowledged by some brave physicians. Yesterday, a reader emailed to me a photograph of a notice displayed by a medical practice in New Jersey, USA (Figure 191.2). A check of the practice website proves its authenticity.


Figure 191.2: Well done to a brave and principled medical practitioner, Dr Anthony Lucatorto, who has been serving his community for 27 years.


Copyright © 2022 Morris Sussex Family Practice

Proof of the dangers to young people is now appearing in scientific literature. One of the most recent, Schauer et al. (2022), refers to the group of highest relative risk, that being males from 12 to 39 years of age. It beggars belief that any intelligent person could recommend to young people, who are at negligible risk of any serious respiratory viral illness, a largely untested drug which is neither safe nor effective. Of course, no intelligent person would. As for those who saw fit to have their own children injected, words fail me.

Copyright © 2022 Paul Spradbery

Reference

Schauer, J., Buddhe, S., Gulhane, A., Sagiv, E., Studer, M., Colyer, J., Chikkabyrappa, S. M., Law, Y., & Portman, M. A. (2002). Persistent Cardiac MRI Findings in a Cohort of Adolescents with post COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myopericarditis. Journal of Pediatrics, S0022-3476(22), 282-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.03.032

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.