The Second Holocaust

Vera Sharav (Figure 206.1) is 85 years old. She is small and slight, perhaps a little frail physically, but her mind and memory are fit and functioning as well as ever. A Jew, born in Romania just before the beginning of World War Two, she survived the Holocaust, although her father did not. After the war, she was reunited with her mother in New York. As an adult, she obtained a master’s degree, married and had two children.

Figure 206.1: Vera Sharav speaks at Nuremberg, Germany

Copyright © 2022 Children’s Health Defense

Vera has spent her life campaigning against medical tyranny and the corruption within the pharmaceutical industry (which, believe me, is even more pervasive than recent multibillion-dollar fines suggest). Regarding the ‘COVID pandemic’, she has, despite her age, become more compelling than ever. She has, for example, been scathing about the imposition of mask-wearing. ‘It means: I am not a free agent. I also see the mask as equivalent to the yellow star that I had to wear.’

If I were to write on this website that ‘the mask is the equivalent of the yellow star that Jews had to wear’, I doubt that I would get away with it. Vera, by contrast, as a consequence of her status as a Holocaust survivor, is all but untouchable. Who would be crass enough to condemn a brave, odds-defying octogenarian for speaking from such rare, first-hand experience? Moreover, who would be qualified?

A week ago, Vera gave an impassioned speech (Figure 206.2) at the 75th anniversary event of the publication of the Nuremberg Code (Nuremberg Code, 1947). Forming the entire basis of medical ethics, this is one of the most important documents ever written. In 1996, an American medical ethics expert, Professor Jacob Katz (1922-2008), remarked, perhaps with unintentional foresight, that:

‘... the Western world initially dismissed the Nuremberg Code as a code for barbarians, but unnecessary (or superfluous) for ordinary physicians (Katz, 1996)’.

Dr Katz is right, but I doubt that he could have predicted the past two-and-a-half years. Given the barbarity of coerced/mandated injections with experimental ‘COVID’ drugs — which governments, regulators and Big Pharma knew in advance would prove lethal — the Code has become more relevant than ever.

Figure 206.2: To date, the most important speech of the 21st century.

‘FREIHEIT’, by the way, is German for ‘FREEDOM’.

Copyright © 2022 Children’s Health Defense

Corporate media did not report this historic event.

Copyright © 2022 Paul Spradbery

References

Nuremberg Code. (1947). Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D. C., United States of America: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1949.

Katz, J. (1996). The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial: A Reappraisal. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276(20), 1662-1666. Retrieved from https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/411048. doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540200048030