Tuesday, December 27, 2022

No Mercy — Onward To Nuremberg

At the beginning of this year, I began Article 185, somewhat optimistically, with the words:

Let us all hope that 2022 will be the year when humanity continues to revert to its senses and rebels against the anti-scientific ‘COVID’ tyranny.

Well, there has been encouraging progress. More and more individuals are slowly realizing that ‘COVID’ was not a pandemic but an elaborate psy-op, contrived, as Bill Gates admitted, to inject every person on the planet, regardless of necessity (none), efficacy (none) or, most crucially, personal danger (no end of). If ‘booster’ uptake is a relevant marker, then Gates and his globalist bum-chums have lost this battle, along with any shreds of moral or intellectual credibility that they might previously have possessed.

I have fought my corner, albeit a relatively obscure one. Apart from the faithful followers of El Escritor Inglés, and fellow researchers interacting with me on scientific forums, my audience is small. What was always needed is for those with millions of eager devotees to wake up and rise up. This is, to my delight, beginning to happen.

For example, Oscar-winning American actor Tim Robbins (1958-) (Figure 214.1) is one of Hollywood’s most socially-aware individuals. A University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) graduate, he has a multi-decade reputation for being thoughtful and articulate. He is, politically, of the left and has supported several high-profile causes throughout his career.

However, in a recent interview with the British comedian and social commentator Russell Brand (1975-), Robbins made a welcome admission. While hoodwinked and brainwashed by the fraudulent ‘COVID’ narrative, he became ‘tribal, angry, vindictive’ towards the ‘unvaccinated’.


Figure 214.1: Oscar-winner Tim Robbins sees the light.

Copyright © 2022 Russell Brand

I bought into it,’ Robbins admitted. ‘And I was masking everywhere. I was keeping my social distance so as adhering to the requests made of me. And I felt angry at people that didn’t do that.

Robbins was not alone. Millions throughout the world were duped into blaming the imposition of tyranny not on the perpetrators but on those of us who were wide awake and resisting it in brave defence of everyone, including Mr Robbins himself.

It wasn’t until I came to the UK in January of 2021 that I started to have questions,’ said Robbins. ‘I noticed a lot of people were not adhering again to these requests made by their government. And I thought, well, they’re going to have a hard day coming up, you know, that there will be some serious death here. And I kept my mask on and I kept adhering to the policies. But it wasn’t until much later that I started to have questions.

‘When I saw that there wasn’t a huge death rate in Britain after I had witnessed personally what it was happening, I started to wonder more and more about what we were being told and whether it was true or not. And so it took a while for me to speak about it.

‘I began to educate myself, and I began to open my mind to what was going on.’

In my view, Robbins deserves credit for his contrition and humility. He had looked — belatedly — beyond the propaganda, asked himself honest questions and, finally, gone public with the only rational conclusions. Even so, how much applause is he due? Should he be welcomed with open arms into the Wide Awake Club or publicly derided for initially advocating a vile persecution of the thinking minority? It is a difficult question to answer. On the one hand, his initial views might have fortified the fraud in the minds of others; conversely, his Damascene conversion is a substantial boon to the cause of worldwide liberty.

Prominent medical practitioners, too, are finally opening their eyes. In Australia last week, former federal Member of Parliament, and Australian Medical Association president, Dr Kerryn Phelps (1957-) (Figure 214.2), spoke out about ‘devastating vaccine injuries’ suffered by her patients, her partner and herself. Dr Phelps also confirmed that the rate of serious adverse events is systematically underreported, owing to censorship and threats to medical professionals.


Figure 214.2: Dr Kerryn Phelps (left) with her partner, Jackie Stricker

Copyright © 2022 Dylan Robinson

The same question, however, applies: should Dr Phelps be applauded for her honesty and newly-discovered insight, or does she stand eternally culpable for the inevitable deaths and injuries suffered by those who were guided by her original, misinformed, pro-‘vaccine’ advice?

Perhaps the most notable mea culpa has come from Professor Emily Oster (1980-) (Figure 214.3), of Brown University, Rhode Island, USA. An economist, albeit with no scientific credentials, this professor has been slated far and wide for calling for an amnesty for all those who imposed or advocated the draconian ‘COVID’ mandates. Does this naïve academic honestly believe that the millions of innocent people who have been crippled physically, financially, socially, educationally and psychologically, based on a monstrous pack of lies, are going to forgive and forget — or that they should?


Figure 214.3: Professor Emily Oster might have just let the cat out of the bag.

Copyright © 2022 TED Conferences, LLC

Professor Oster ought to be reminded that an amnesty — for anything — is something that is proposed by the victims of injustice, not a ruse suggested by the perpetrators or their agents. It is, therefore, not at all surprising that so much vitriol has been thrown in her direction. If I had a drop to spare, I would join the bombardment.

I wonder, though, why she made this deeply offensive suggestion in the first place. Is she trying to save her own skin, following her initial support of ‘COVID’ tyranny? Is she clumsily testing the water, perhaps as a spokesperson for those higher up?

Whatever she is thinking, only those guilty of wrongdoing beg for mercy. There must be none shown — no amnesty, no forgiving and no forgetting. All those involved in this unparalleled crime against humanity must stand trial in a legitimate court of law — i.e. Nuremberg 2.0.

2022 witnessed the truth being told. There must be justice in 2023.

Copyright © 2022 Paul Spradbery

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.