Three weeks ago, in Article 216, I reported on a recent comment by a British MP, Andrew Bridgen. Mr Bridgen had quoted a Jewish-Israeli cardiologist who claims that the millions of deaths and injuries from the ‘COVID vaccines’ constitute the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust.
It was a bold statement. How predictable, then, that Mr Bridgen was immediately condemned by two proven liars, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and the former Secretary of State for Health, Matt Hancock. These two disgusting creatures accused Mr Bridgen of antisemitism and summarily ejected him from the Conservative party.
This knee-jerk accusation is as juvenile as it is bizarre. To my great pleasure, Sunak and Hancock were put forcefully back under their respective rocks by a powerful authority. An impressive group of Jewish doctors and scientists (Figure 223.1) sprang to Mr Bridgen’s defence and signed the following letter in protest:
Dear Prime Minister Sunak,
We, a group of Jewish medical scientists, physicians and researchers from several countries including Israel and the UK, would like to express our dismay at the decision to suspend Member of Parliament Mr. Andrew Bridgen as a Conservative MP due in part to what you claim was an “antisemitic” tweet that he made in relation to the covid-19 vaccine roll-out.
In the UK alone, since the roll-out of the BioNTech-Pfizer mRNA vaccine, there have been almost half a million Yellow Card reports of adverse events from the public. This is more than all the yellow card reports for all medications for the past 40 years combined. This adds to the growing incidence of reports of death and other side effects that are beyond mild, which have been reported in many countries across the world. The data for other covid-19 vaccines is equally concerning.
Mr. Bridgen tweeted that “one consultant cardiologist said to me this [the vaccine roll-out] is the biggest crime against humanity since the holocaust.”
Aside from the fact that Mr Bridgen was clearly reporting the words of someone else, the word “since” does not in any case imply equivalence to the events of the Holocaust; for that and other reasons the tweet is not antisemitic.
It seems that you and others have seized upon the opportunity to raise the issue of antisemitism in order to limit the free speech of those who raise legitimate concerns about the efficacy and safety of these Covid vaccines and, needless to say, their mandating or coercion, which breached many well- established ethical norms.
Weaponisation of the important issue of antisemitism for these purposes is particularly objectionable and disrespectful towards its victims.
Limiting free speech, along with “othering” and scapegoating people who hold different perspectives, is indeed part of the text-book behaviour of all the totalitarian governments, which have been responsible for the biggest crimes against humanity throughout history.
We respectfully request that you withdraw the accusations of antisemitism levelled at Mr Bridgen.
Sincerely,
Jewish doctors and scientists
Figure 223.1: The letter’s signatories and their impressive credentials
Copyright © 2023 Jewish Doctors and Scientists
Boom. Rarely has cheap name-calling been trounced so swiftly and powerfully. If this is the best ammunition Sunak and Hancock can fire, then their armouries are bare for all to see.
Mr Bridgen, too, has stood up to the political bullies. In a subsequent statement, he wrote:
‘Matt Hancock has still not removed his defamatory tweet falsely alleging that I am antisemitic. I will allow Matt three days to apologise publicly for calling me an antisemite and racist or he will be contacted by my legal team.’
Mr Bridgen is suing Hancock for £100,000, which would be given to a ‘vaccine’ victims support group. If Hancock has any common sense, he will retract his latest repulsive outburst and settle out of Court. If the case goes to trial, he would be liable for damages and costs — Mr Bridgen’s, as well as his own. I would bet that all the aforementioned signatories would be only too willing to repeat their expert opinions before a High Court judge.
It is notable that Mr Bridgen and his supporters have repudiated any claim that the original tweet compared the ‘COVID vaccine’ massacre with the Holocaust. This was, in my view, an unnecessary concession. Given the underreporting factor with regard to the official adverse events data, published by Harvard University, it is clear that the total ‘COVID vaccine’ deaths are approximately 100,000 (UK), 400,000 to 800,000 (US) and 20 million worldwide. Thus, the comparison would be perfectly valid. I did not hesitate to use the title The Second Holocaust for Article 206, posted six months ago. If Hancock or any other lying ignoramus wishes to libel me as an antisemite, then I would be happy to sue.
Finally, on the subject of Holocaust comparisons, the Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP), funded by the Children’s Health Defense (CHD), a non-profit organization led by Robert F. Kennedy Jnr, has just released a five-part film series entitled Never Again Is Now Global (Figure 223.2).
Copyright © 2023 AHRP/CHD
I watched the final episode last night. The interviews, and footage of State tyranny, police brutality, enforced isolation, quarantine camps, mandated medical experimentation, mass deaths and desperate media cover-ups, remove every iota of doubt that another Holocaust has recently been inflicted on humanity. For Nazis, read globalists; for Josef Mengele, read Anthony Fauci; for Joseph Goebbels, read British Broadcasting Corporation; for the European Jews, read the ‘unvaccinated’; and for evil personified, read William Henry Gates III.
Copyright © 2023 Paul Spradbery
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.