El Escritor Inglés: March 2021

Sunday, March 28, 2021

Pandemic Déjà Vu

déjà vu (noun) /ˌdeɪʒɑː ˈvuː/ (from French)

the feeling that you have previously experienced something that is happening to you now

Oxford English Dictionary (2021).

* * * * *

In January 2010, a brave man called Dr Wolfgang Wodarg sounded an alarm.

Dr Wodarg is a German physician, a respiratory disease expert, and former politician. A member of Germany’s Social Democratic Party, he served as a member of the Bundestag from 1994 to 2009. As Chair of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee, he called for an emergency debate into alleged undue influence exerted by Big Pharma on the World Health Organization (WHO) global H1N1 ‘swine’ flu campaign.

The Wodarg Resolution (Wodarg, 2010) stated:

‘In order to promote their patented drugs and vaccines ..., pharmaceutical companies influenced scientists and official agencies, responsible for public health standards, to alarm governments worldwide and ... needlessly expose millions of healthy people to the risk of an unknown amount of side-effects of insufficiently-tested vaccines.’

The investigation examined the issue of ‘falsified pandemic’, declared by the WHO following advice from the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), whose members were exposed as having substantial financial interests with Big Pharma (GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Roche and Novartis), who manufactured and marketed ‘poorly-tested vaccines’ (Figure 157.1).

Figure 157.1: The swine flu episode was an attempted scam.

Copyright © 2010 Reach plc

Unknown to almost everyone, in April 2009, the WHO surreptitiously altered the criteria needed to declare a pandemic. The new definition was dependent no longer on risk and mortality rate but on ‘cases’ alone. Further, the term ‘case’ was changed to mean ‘positive test’, regardless of the presence or absence of clinical symptoms or the authenticity of the test itself.

Having reclassified the swine flu outbreak as a pandemic, nations were compelled to implement ‘pandemic plans’ and purchase swine flu vaccines at enormous cost. One such vaccine, Pandemrix, made by GSK, turned out to have disastrous effects. Children across Europe developed narcolepsy (brain condition inducing sudden sleep) and cataplexy (sudden muscular weakness), each causing bodily collapse without warning. These conditions are incurable and often lead to serious mental health problems. UK health workers were pressured by management into having the vaccine, and similar cases were reported.

This was after the UK’s Chief Medical Officer, supported by the Department of Health, had announced that the vaccine had been ‘thoroughly tested’ and was safe. It was a lie. Pandemrix had been fast-tracked without essential long-term clinical trials. Worse still, vaccine recipients were never told that the government had privately agreed to indemnify GSK against any subsequent legal actions.

Prior to the vaccine scandal, there had been much melodramatic scaremongering. The scaremonger-in-chief was a non-medically-qualified, self-taught ‘mathematical modeller’ called Neil Ferguson, of Imperial College, London. His previous forecasts had been so dire (Figure 157.2), it is a mystery to me why he had not been fired for being useless years beforehand.

Figure 157.2: If my mathematical calculations were as embarrassingly poor as those of Professor Neil Ferguson, my colleagues would drag me outside and throw random objects at me in the car park.

Foot & Mouth disease (2001): Ferguson 150,000; actual < 200.

Mad Cow disease (2002): Ferguson 50,000; actual 177.

Bird flu (2005): Ferguson 150,000,000; actual 282.

Swine flu (2009): Ferguson 65,000; actual 457.

It must be noted that some of the aforementioned figures were ‘worst-case scenarios’ but passed off as predictions to the general public.

A meticulous study published by DeNoon (2010) proved that the 2009 H1N1 swine flu was no worse than the seasonal flu.

Had Dr Wodarg not sounded the alarm – in so doing, receiving torrents of abuse – the consequences of the corrupt, incestuous relationship between the WHO, Big Pharma, deceitful governments and financially-corrupted advisers could have been incalculable.

Eleven years on, does any of the above sound creepily familiar (Figure 157.3)?

Figure 157.3: ‘I think this vaccination is really the pinnacle of the crime.’

Dr Wolfgang Wodarg (1947-)

https://3speak.tv/watch?v=rair2/pjltinjs

Without the WHO’s redefinition of the word ‘pandemic’, ‘COVID’ could not have been declared as such, and the unlicensed drugs masquerading as vaccines would have been legally unpermissible.

Finally, in 2015, Peter Daszak, of the Eco-Health Alliance, stated the following, which was reported in the National Academies Press on February 12th, 2016:

‘We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.’

As I first wrote more than a year ago (Article 127): we are being played.

References

DeNoon, D. J. (2010). H1N1 Swine Flu No Worse Than Seasonal Flu. Retrieved from https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/news/20100907/h1n1-swine-flu-no-worse-than-seasonal-flu

Wodarg, W. (2010). Motion for a Resolution and a Recommendation: Faked Pandemics - a threat for health. Retrieved from http://www.wodarg.de/english/2948146.html

Saturday, March 27, 2021

Doctors For Covid Ethics

2021 is becoming more sinister by the week. This week, the UK government announced that only ‘vaccinated’ individuals – i.e. human genetic experimentation subjects – should be permitted to enter social venues, such as theatres, sports arenas and even pubs. By armchair logic alone, this discriminatory law would make no sense. If the drug works, then the drugged are not at risk from the undrugged. If it does not work, then there is no reason for anyone to be injected with it in the first place. As I have said repeatedly, both the virus and its so-called ‘vaccine’ are Trojan horses. They are simply a devious means to implement a digital system of totalitarian social control (Figure 156.1), where only those with a State-approved QR code would be afforded basic human rights. This is unprecedented and ethically abhorrent.

Figure 156.1: The Great Reset

‘The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, re-imagine, and reset our world.’

‘You will own nothing, you will have no privacy, and you will be happy.’

Klaus Schwab (1938-), Founder and Executive Chairman of the

(non-democratic, privately-owned) World Economic Forum.

COVID appears to be have been an extremely convenient ‘accident’ for those who, although unelected, believe they have a God-given right to reset our world to their own liking.

Scientific reasons not to accept any of these gene-based drugs are chilling. As predicted, deaths and serious side-effects, such as heart attacks and blindness, have already been reported, following injections. Health service workers are being pressurized into silence regarding serious adverse events and the COVID fraud in general (Figure 156.2).

Figure 156.2: Another brave health worker blows the whistle.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRKUnA251_4

Consequently, a group of doctors and scientists, from 24 countries, led by the eminent Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, submitted a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) a few weeks ago. I am proud to be one of its verified signatories (Figure 156.3).

Figure 156.3: An excerpt of verified signatories from a letter to the EMA, which is now publicly available at:

https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/urgent-open-letter-from-doctors-and-scientists-to-the-european-medicines-agency-regarding-covid-19-f6e17c311595

The letter demanded that all such gene-based therapies be withdrawn immediately. It requested assurances that due diligence had been given, relating particularly to whether standard research criteria had been satisfied. Unless substantive evidence were provided, the letter would be made public. Unfortunately, no such evidence has been made available by the EMA, so it must be concluded that it does not exist.

One of the main concerns, outlined succinctly by Professor Bhakdi, which I raised in Article 153 earlier this month, is the real risk of blood-clotting disorders. Put simply, it is likely that thrombocytes (platelets), whose function is to stem bleeding by forming a ‘clot’, will be stimulated to aggregate in small blood vessels, most dangerously in the brain, spinal cord and heart. This would lead to blood vessel occlusion (blockage), leading to oxygen depletion and permanent tissue damage. Moreover, given that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to platelets, thereby deactivating them in the blood, this will cause thrombocytopenia (low platelet count) and, subsequently, haemorrhagic strokes.

The letter also points out that these unlicensed gene therapies were approved only on the strict basis that an emergency existed. However, evidence shows that it did not exist. Neither the UK’s National Health Service nor its equivalent in other countries was at risk of being overwhelmed. (In many cases, lockdowns and other draconian measures were implemented when the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak was abating.)

The most striking paragraph, though, is this:

‘There are serious concerns ... that the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines by the EMA was premature and reckless, and that the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute “human experimentation”, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.’

I have tried to sound the alarm, particularly to family and friends, and also on this website. (There was no need to alert work colleagues, as they are all fellow scientists and harbour similar reservations.) Sadly, the overwhelming response has been either apathy or hostility. It wearies me that so many people have their heads buried immovably in the sand. Perhaps this is because the implications of reality are too unbearable. Still, having knowledge of serious risks and remaining silent would be morally indefensible on my part.

More welcome is that the letter, now permanently in the public domain, is prompting a positive response. Millions worldwide, however, have already rolled the dice and rolled up their sleeves. For them, there can, sadly, be no going back.

Sunday, March 21, 2021

Open Letter From Dr Mike Yeadon

Dr Mike Yeadon (Figure 155.1) holds degrees in Biochemistry and Toxicology (B.Sc. (Hons)) and Respiratory Pharmacology (Ph.D.). A few years older than I am, he has spent more than 30 years involved in biomedical research. For 16 of those years, he was Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer of Pfizer.

Figure 155.1: Dr Mike Yeadon is a world-renowned respiratory disease expert who, unlike many government advisers, knows Big Pharma inside out and is not financially compromised by profit-driven pushers of what he calls ‘unnecessary vaccines’.

Dr Yeadon has spent the past year trying to educate the public, with respect to SARS-CoV-2, with a meticulously logical destruction of all the dishonest arguments upholding the COVID narrative. Naturally, he has been the victim of relentless, gratuitous abuse. Mainstream media outlets, armed with dubious ‘fact-checker’ websites, have tried desperately to discredit him. It is telling, however, that those media shills never identify their so-called experts, assuming that they even exist, nor state their conflicts of interest. Sky Television, last year, even had the bare-faced gall to broadcast to the public: do not research ‘COVID’ yourselves; we will save you the trouble and provide you with ready-made answers. This insidious propaganda strategy is predicated on public gullibility.

The following excerpts are taken from an open letter from Dr Yeadon, published last Tuesday. The notes in square brackets are mine.

‘Lockdown was not formally considered in SAGE [UK Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies] before Mar 23 2020. At least, it was not minuted. The impression gained is that, counter to the impression given, it was NOT that group but from another source that the seed of the concept was planted. I lean towards Gove [Michael Gove, UK Cabinet Minister].

In the UK, lockdown was implemented supposedly to prevent the overburdening of health services. That argument was always fallacious, as lockdown was imposed after the viral peak and after ‘COVID’ had been officially reduced from High-consequence Infectious Disease (HCID) status.

‘Lockdowns are not associated with reduced mortality anywhere. In retrospect, it’s obvious why not.’

Dr Yeadon is correct. Comparing locked-down and open (normal) regions – US states provide excellent examples – there is no significant difference in mortality rates. As further proof, in recent weeks, 16 of the 50 US states have removed all restrictions, resulting in no change in the incidence of either illness or death.

‘The incorrect assumption was made that, as this is a communicable disease, reducing human contacts MUST reduce transmission. But there’s a fatal flaw in the assumptions used in this line of thinking, and it’s that number of human contacts is what drives transmission.

‘But it’s not. It’s the number of contacts with infected AND infectious people. Such individuals are not broadly distributed through the population, but are instead highly concentrated in institutions (hospitals & care homes) and to a lesser extent private homes.’

‘Individuals moving about in the community, in public eg shops & in the street, and also at work, are heavily DESELECTED for infected & infectious people. This is because there’s a strong overlap between high viral load & symptoms (not a surprise) and you need both high viral load as well as symptoms to be an efficient transmitter.’

This nails one of the principal ‘COVID’ falsehoods, that of asymptomatic viral transmission. Rationally and evidently, without symptoms, viral load would be insufficient to cross-infect.

‘Because they have symptoms, they usually feel unwell & frankly sometimes seriously ill. These people in the main are NOT going to be encountered in the community, shops or work.’

This shows clearly why, as has been documented, most transmission has reputedly occurred in hospitals and care homes, and almost none in schools and supermarkets.

‘Lockdown made essentially no difference to transmission yet crushed the economy and civil society for no discernible gains.

‘Those are the empirical observations. This is a plausible explanation why that’s what happened. I predict that the same people, using the same, flawed models & the same, untrustworthy PCR testing will be a pretext for locking us down again in the autumn for another six months. They’re building new Lighthouse Labs [biomedical diagnostics facility in Cheshire, UK] capacity right now.

‘The future is obvious. I’ll just get more insults for speaking out. If you choose to be silent, I predict we’ll see the destruction of western, liberal democracy. Why is anybody’s guess, but the direction of travel is quite clear.’

Mike, I choose not to be silent – nor silenced. SARS-CoV-2, per se, has not given rise to any excess mortality anywhere, and it was never likely to do so; economies have been irreversibly destroyed; populations have been terrified by lies and are now emotionally immune to proven facts; the world’s leading scientists continue to be censored and abused; lockdown, and other draconian measures, have been positively harmful to public health and well-being; and universal submission to potentially dangerous ‘vaccines’ is now being touted as the only permissible key to unlock the ‘COVID’ prison and release basic human liberty.

If justice is to prevail, we shall need ‘Nuremberg’ trials (Figure 155.2).

Figure 155.2: At Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany in August 1946, Hermann Goering and 20 other top-ranking Nazi officials were, in view of the whole world, tried and convicted of crimes against humanity. No lesser fate is deserved by the perpetrators of the ‘COVID’ fraud.

Copyright expired

Saturday, March 13, 2021

COVID-19: Online Censorship

Yesterday evening, I published Article 153. I woke up this morning to discover that the video contained therein, featuring trial lawyer Dr Reiner Fuellmich discussing the latest Corona Committee evidence, has been summarily erased. The reason? Any claims about COVID ‘vaccinations’ that contradict the official narrative are prohibited (Figure 154.1). So much for freedom of expression. So much for the fact that the video and my accompanying notes are evidence-based.

Figure 154.1: YouTube is a privately-owned organization and is fully entitled to remove any content it does not like, and for whatever reason. This I concede. I am, however, left to wonder at its blanket suppression of counternarrative content and thus freedom of expression. This proves, therefore, that it is, above all else, a political organization with its own agenda.

No matter. Time for Plan B. The censored video can, for now, be found at:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GQioCxT7fZQ

My ten censored notes are listed in Article 153. Having been provoked, I shall provide ten more for good measure.

11. Big Pharma, politicians and mainstream media have deliberately called this gene therapy a vaccine, when, demonstrably, it is not. Should we trust bare-faced liars?

12. This novel treatment, even if safe, would provide minimal protection and only for short periods. It prevents neither infection nor transmission. The prospect of repeated shots has already been discussed by Big Pharma who would make vast sums of money on a regular and perpetual basis. Their strategy is, therefore, to transform entire populations, unnecessarily, into lifelong drug dependency.

13. There are not only simpler, cheaper treatment alternatives, but the human immune system is proven to be 99.9% effective in dealing with acute respiratory infections.

14. Politicians and their advisers have been exposed, repeatedly, as liars and purveyors of exaggerated statistics. Many of them are in conflict of interest with regard to Big Pharma and the Gates Foundation.

15. Those of us who are sceptical or critical of this treatment risk being censored, ostracized, threatened or fired from work. History shows that truth and morality are rarely on the side of the establishment.

16. If this treatment were transparently beneficial, there would be no need for constant mass media propaganda and insidious behaviour manipulation.

17. Big Pharma have an alarming history of products giving rise to mass serious adverse events, then covering up the truth. Have you ever heard of the Pandemrix scandal? If not, please look it up.

18. In many countries, including the UK, medical practitioners are paid per injection. They are, therefore, in conflict of interest and their advice is compromised.

19. Pfizer executives and board members have stated that they have not been injected with their own product, as it would be unfair to jump the queue. (I find this rather amusing.) Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla was prevented from entering Israel for being ‘unvaccinated’.

20. Government and mass media have extolled the supposed benefits of this novel treatment but never stressed the potential risks or debated the issue publicly with any of the eminent doctors and scientists who vehemently disagree with them.

Anyone who submits to this treatment is, in my view, either misinformed or just plain mad.

Friday, March 12, 2021

Corona Committee Update

Within the past two months, Big Pharma have rolled out a variety of vaccines in the name of combating the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Only they are not vaccines, as they do not introduce an antigen to the body and confer immunity. They are more truthfully described as unlicensed experimental gene therapies, using misinformed humans as mice in a worldwide laboratory.

Furthermore:

1. All such therapies require medium and long-term clinical trials. These have undergone none and are, therefore, potentially very dangerous.

2. Potential serious health risks include, but are not limited to, infertility (both male and female), autoimmune disease, blood-clotting disorders, antibody dependent enhancement and cancer.

3. Big Pharma corporations are indemnified against any future civil claims for damages in the event of serious adverse reactions.

4. Other (cheaper) treatments, such as ivermectin, which have been shown to be extremely effective against respiratory viral disease, have been purposefully sidelined in favour of (ultra-lucrative) ‘vaccines’, which would be required in perpetuity.

5. Many world-renowned doctors and scientists, including Professor Sucharit Bhakdi and Dr Mike Yeadon, have already demanded, citing verifiable scientific evidence, that (European) authorities withdraw immediately all such treatments.

6. Even using systematically-inflated mortality data, the infection fatality rate of SARS-CoV-2 lies between 0.14 and 0.15%, similar to that of seasonal flu. This figure diminishes to less than 0.001% in healthy individuals under the age of 60 years.

7. Governments are desperate to introduce so-called ‘freedom passes’, thereby denying basic liberties to those who, sensibly, refuse this largely untested medical treatment.

8. Coercion, regarding any medical treatment, blatantly contravenes the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki.

9. All over the world, as I write, people are dying unexpectedly following ‘COVID vaccination’.

10. Finally – this is the real kicker – there was no excess mortality, either in the UK or worldwide, in 2020. This simple fact alone proves unequivocally that there has been no viral pandemic. COVID is the biggest, and most disgusting, lie ever told.

In Article 142, I included a video published in October last year by the eminent corporate trial lawyer, Dr Reiner Fuellmich, regarding the ongoing COVID fraud. In the meantime, Dr Fuellmich, a member of the German Corona Committee, has organized an international network of lawyers and is on the verge of bringing class action lawsuits against the main perpetrators of the COVID scandal (Figure 153.1). This will be the biggest tort case in legal history.

Figure 153.1: Dr Reiner Fuellmich discusses the latest evidence from the Corona Committee. Some might find parts of this testimony distressing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmjHmjsBfxk

Dr Fuellmich and his colleagues, supported by some of the world’s most esteemed scientists, are fighting for free humanity. They must not fail. They simply cannot.