DOUBLE-LENGTH
ARTICLE
Following
my previous post – Doing The Wuhan Shake (126) – an irate correspondent
accused me of being frivolous. OK, perhaps I was. Following the post before
that – Frankenstein’s Virus (125) – the same keyboard warrior castigated
me for not ruling out the possibility that the official response to the whole coronavirus crisis was a
charade. How could I rule it out? Regardless of whether the outbreak of this supposedly novel virus was ‘born of negligence or
mischief’, it is the perfect pretext for a socioeconomic reset.
The
world economy is about to buckle under the weight of ever-increasing, and ever-faster-increasing, debt. It is, therefore,
being terminated systematically, so that the fallout can be controlled. Food rationing is being considered, ‘in response to stockpiling and shortage’. Cash use in shops is
being discouraged, ‘to prevent cross-infection’. Surveillance measures are
being imposed, ‘to prevent spread’. Freedom of expression is being curtailed, ‘to counter fake news’. Ask yourselves: when the crisis recedes, do
you think that all these restrictions to liberty will be reversed in full? More crucially, what will cause more deaths, the imminent economic depression or the virus itself?
Governments,
via their controlled media, are, transparently, orchestrating mass panic. News coverage is incredible. Even the anti-Brexit bias was more subtle than this. The message is that COVID-19 is a short road to Armageddon. We should not be fooled by this Goebbels-esque propaganda. Politicians’ devious
intentions have been predictable for some time (see excerpts below).
*
* * *
*
‘The debt crisis ... worsens by the day. Insolvent central
banks are lending money to insolvent banks who buy government debt from
insolvent governments who lend money to the International Monetary Fund which
then lends it to insolvent governments to pay back insolvent banks.’
–
La Casa de Ponzi (Article 44, 23 Jun 2012)
*
* * *
*
‘Total economic collapse of the West is now inevitable. Few
acknowledge it, though, and most people seem blissfully unaware of what lies
ahead.’
–
Laissez-faire It Ain't (Article 66, 30 Sep 2013)
*
* * *
*
‘Politicians and bankers are keen to establish a cashless
society. Cui bono? Is it for the public’s benefit, we are entitled to wonder,
or for their own? Precisely: the alarm bells should be deafening us all.’
–
Cash In Peril (Article 82, 21 Apr 2015)
*
* * *
*
‘Today, the whole world is hooked on debt. Whether it is
government debt, commercial debt or personal/household debt, it can never be
paid back. Debt expansion is the only way modern economies can grow, and it is
entirely by design. Inevitably, the world has crossed the financial Rubicon,
and the fallout from the eventual economic collapse will be severe.’
–
The Silent Go-Karts (Article 83, 20 May 2015)
*
* * *
*
‘A ... “helicopter drop” … could be credited to the account of
every taxpayer. Producing vast quantities of (unearned) paper money would be
inflationary, perhaps hyperinflationary, and ultimately ruinous. Thus, (the)
choice would be: (currency)-printing, leading to hyperinflation Zimbabwe-style;
or not printing, allowing a deflationary spiral to fuel mass unemployment.
Severe civil unrest might result from either.
‘So, what else … ? You might choose to cut interest rates –
all the way to zero – in order to make debt-servicing possible. What if,
however, they already were close to zero, having been so since the previous
financial crisis ... , when public debt was only half its current level? What
then, particularly if this cheap money tactic had facilitated not a reduction
of debt but a reckless expansion of it? Well, how about introducing a negative
interest rate policy (NIRP), where banks would charge interest on deposits? A
rational public would immediately withdraw their funds ... and create runs on
all high street banks. Given that potential outcome, perhaps panic withdrawals
could be outlawed. The outright abolition of cash, leaving only digital bank
account credits, would preclude any such crisis.’
–
Cameron Behind The Curtain (Article 91, 9 Feb 2016)
*
* * *
*
‘Throughout the developed world, the super-rich are fleeing
cities like proverbial ship rats. Their actions seem to conform to the
narrative accepted by many observers – myself included – that world economic
collapse cannot be forestalled for much longer. When the debt-based currency
system inevitably implodes, civilized society might well go with it. Other
possible triggers range from natural disasters to chemical, biological or
nuclear incidents.’
–
Los Locos Vivos (Article 94, 30 Apr 2016)
*
* * *
*
SARS-CoV-2,
despite having been bio-engineered for increased virulence, poses no mortal danger to
the overwhelming majority. However, worldwide economic and societal collapse
would be catastrophic for all but a select few. That is the preferred option to
those in power. This rotten economic system can survive no longer, so it is
being taken down in such a way that blame deflection may be rationalized
(Figure 127.1).
Copyright © 2020 FinancialAnalysis.tv
Copyright
© 2020 Paul Spradbery
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.