Open Letter From Dr Mike Yeadon

Dr Mike Yeadon (Figure 155.1) holds degrees in Biochemistry and Toxicology (B.Sc. (Hons)) and Respiratory Pharmacology (Ph.D.). A few years older than I am, he has spent more than 30 years involved in biomedical research. For 16 of those years, he was Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer of Pfizer.

Figure 155.1: Dr Mike Yeadon is a world-renowned respiratory disease expert who, unlike many government advisers, knows Big Pharma inside out and is not financially compromised by profit-driven pushers of what he calls ‘unnecessary vaccines’.

Copyright © 2021 World News Today

Dr Yeadon has spent the past year trying to educate the public, with respect to SARS-CoV-2, with a meticulously logical destruction of all the dishonest arguments upholding the COVID narrative. Naturally, he has been the victim of relentless, gratuitous abuse. Mainstream media outlets, armed with dubious ‘fact-checker’ websites, have tried desperately to discredit him. It is telling, however, that those media shills never identify their so-called experts, assuming that they even exist, nor state their conflicts of interest. Sky Television, last year, even had the bare-faced gall to broadcast to the public: do not research ‘COVID’ yourselves; we will save you the trouble and provide you with ready-made answers. This insidious propaganda strategy is predicated on public gullibility.

The following excerpts are taken from an open letter from Dr Yeadon, published last Tuesday. The notes in square brackets are mine.

‘Lockdown was not formally considered in SAGE [UK Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies] before Mar 23 2020. At least, it was not minuted. The impression gained is that, counter to the impression given, it was NOT that group but from another source that the seed of the concept was planted. I lean towards Gove [Michael Gove, UK Cabinet Minister].

In the UK, lockdown was implemented supposedly to prevent the overburdening of health services. That argument was always fallacious, as lockdown was imposed after the viral peak and after ‘COVID’ had been officially reduced from High-consequence Infectious Disease (HCID) status.

‘Lockdowns are not associated with reduced mortality anywhere. In retrospect, it’s obvious why not.’

Dr Yeadon is correct. Comparing locked-down and open (normal) regions – US states provide excellent examples – there is no significant difference in mortality rates. As further proof, in recent weeks, 16 of the 50 US states have removed all restrictions, resulting in no change in the incidence of either illness or death.

‘The incorrect assumption was made that, as this is a communicable disease, reducing human contacts MUST reduce transmission. But there’s a fatal flaw in the assumptions used in this line of thinking, and it’s that number of human contacts is what drives transmission.

‘But it’s not. It’s the number of contacts with infected AND infectious people. Such individuals are not broadly distributed through the population, but are instead highly concentrated in institutions (hospitals & care homes) and to a lesser extent private homes.’

‘Individuals moving about in the community, in public eg shops & in the street, and also at work, are heavily DESELECTED for infected & infectious people. This is because there’s a strong overlap between high viral load & symptoms (not a surprise) and you need both high viral load as well as symptoms to be an efficient transmitter.’

This nails one of the principal ‘COVID’ falsehoods, that of asymptomatic viral transmission. Rationally and evidently, without symptoms, viral load would be insufficient to cross-infect.

‘Because they have symptoms, they usually feel unwell & frankly sometimes seriously ill. These people in the main are NOT going to be encountered in the community, shops or work.’

This shows clearly why, as has been documented, most transmission has reputedly occurred in hospitals and care homes, and almost none in schools and supermarkets.

‘Lockdown made essentially no difference to transmission yet crushed the economy and civil society for no discernible gains.

‘Those are the empirical observations. This is a plausible explanation why that’s what happened. I predict that the same people, using the same, flawed models & the same, untrustworthy PCR testing will be a pretext for locking us down again in the autumn for another six months. They’re building new Lighthouse Labs [biomedical diagnostics facility in Cheshire, UK] capacity right now.

‘The future is obvious. I’ll just get more insults for speaking out. If you choose to be silent, I predict we’ll see the destruction of western, liberal democracy. Why is anybody’s guess, but the direction of travel is quite clear.’

Mike, I choose not to be silent – nor silenced. SARS-CoV-2, per se, has not given rise to any excess mortality anywhere, and it was never likely to do so; economies have been irreversibly destroyed; populations have been terrified by lies and are now emotionally immune to proven facts; the world’s leading scientists continue to be censored and abused; lockdown, and other draconian measures, have been positively harmful to public health and well-being; and universal submission to potentially dangerous ‘vaccines’ is now being touted as the only permissible key to unlock the ‘COVID’ prison and release basic human liberty.

If justice is to prevail, we shall need ‘Nuremberg’ trials (Figure 155.2).

Figure 155.2: At Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany in August 1946, Hermann Goering and 20 other top-ranking Nazi officials were, in view of the whole world, tried and convicted of crimes against humanity. No lesser fate is deserved by the perpetrators of the ‘COVID’ fraud.

Copyright expired

Copyright © 2021 Paul Spradbery