Throughout my first stint at university, in the late 1980s, I spent a significant amount of time studying cranial (X-ray) radiographs. As part of orthodontics and maxillofacial surgery, it was deemed essential to carrying out detailed cephalometric analysis. (This is the study of skeletal and dental relationships as a preliminary part of clinical treatment planning.) For fourteen subsequent years in clinical settings, I took and analysed such radiographs on a daily basis.
Partly for that reason, and given my later involvement in forensic science, I have been chronically intrigued by the JFK assassination (22nd November, 1963), particularly in the light of all the (patently obvious) lies and distortions detailed in the official Warren Commission Report, published in 1964 (Figure 252.1).
Figure 252.1: The cover-up was even more cack-handed than the assassination.
Copyright © 1964 The Warren Commission
Had the Warren Commission been credible, few would have questioned it. The fact that there have since been numerous books and other documents written about the assassination is a direct consequence of the fact that the official report flies in the face of both verifiable evidence and the laws of physics. I have read many books proposing alternative explanations, from the honestly speculative to the downright ludicrous, but most fall flat somewhere along the way.
The following book has been (too) long in coming. Expert radiologist Dr David W. Mantik has painstakingly carried out optical density analysis of the JFK skull radiographs, and the evidence has been comprehensively documented by best-selling author Dr Jerome R. Corsi (Figure 252.2). The conclusions are unequivocal: (1) bullets entered JFK’s head from both front and back, thus proving conspiracy; (2) radiographs were doctored, in a ham-fisted fashion, to disguise evidence of the frontal shots; and (3) the Pentagon, FBI, CIA and all successive US governments stand guilty of having maintained the original lies for more than six decades. National security? Pull the other one.
Figure 252.2: Drs Mantik and Corsi deserve immense credit for bringing the truth into the open. I should also mention a British historian called Francis R. Conolly, whose documentary film Everything Is A Rich Man’s Trick is equally impressive in its factual analysis.
Copyright © 2024 David W. Mantik & Jerome R. Corsi
Such a monumental saga of deceit prompts the inevitable question: what else does the State lie about? The answer is: everything. Moreover, no issue has ever been too monstrous to deter State-serving liars. From JFK to 9/11 to ‘COVID’, the lies are not only enormous but all too easy for the inquiring mind to identify and subsequently dismantle with the requisite knowledge and logic.
As the ‘COVID’ scam continues its inevitable exposure, the State is becoming frantic. Hardly a day passes without some State stooge pontificating about ‘disinformation peddlers’, ‘conspiracy theorists’ or ‘social media trolls’. The hallowed BBC even has its own BBC Verify section, designed to put out wildfires of truth, and fronted by an unremarkable youngster called Marianna Spring, whom I seem able only to pity. For the first time in history, people are not dependent on the State as the sole source of mass information. The internet, particularly social media, has removed that power — and the State does not like it.
The remedy is simple: if the State told the truth, then there would be little public curiosity. Those of us with a natural tendency to dispute rickety State narratives would have neither credibility nor motivation. Recently, some governments have become so desperate that they are demanding criminal prosecution for anyone questioning the State. Hot potato issues of sexes (there are only two), anthropogenic climate change (a lie) and a litany of ‘woke’ claptrap are prominent examples of State narratives contradicting overwhelming scientific evidence and, in extreme cases, self-evident truth.
This week’s example of self-exposed bullshit concerns Catherine, the Princess of Wales. Having been publicly invisible since last December, it was announced two days ago that, after undergoing major surgery, Her Royal Highness has been diagnosed with cancer. This belated announcement highlights two huge issues which will not go away.
First, when media (and social media) commentators began wondering why HRH had not been seen for so long, someone in authority decided to publish no less than four doctored photographs in a witless attempt to convince the world that there was ‘nothing to see here’. Intelligent, observant members of the public, a.k.a. conspiracy theorists, saw through the deception immediately. Why lie if the truth would suffice? It follows, therefore, that the truth would not suffice. Why not?
Furthermore, the video of HRH sitting alone on a garden bench, against a seasonal backdrop of blooming daffodils, was weird to say the least (Figure 252.3). The complete stillness of the flower heads indicated that the background was fake and that a videographic ‘green screen’ had probably been used. Why not use a real setting rather than something so conspicuously contrived? Even more strange, the image of HRH resembled so-called ‘deep fake artificial intelligence’, which seems boundless in its ability to make the unreal appear real. Research it, if you doubt me. Lastly, there is no proof regarding when the video was made. Why not? This would be easy to do and would limit further speculation.
Figure 252.3: Anyone au fait with AI fakery would find this widely-available video message eerily familiar.
Copyright © 2024 Kensington Palace
Given this lack of rational resolution, speculation will surely continue. Some commentators even maintain that HRH is dead. Far-fetched, perhaps, and, according to some, distasteful, but how would the public know?
The second issue concerns the dreaded clot shot. In Article 186, published on 22nd January, 2022, I expressed my amazement, and disgust, at HRH for recommending the clot shot, even for pregnant women. She also allowed her own ‘vaccination’ to be filmed and broadcast (Figure 252.4), presumably to convince others to do likewise.
Figure 252.4: How many people decided to be ‘vaccinated’, and subsequently died or suffered serious injury, after being inspired by this footage?
Copyright © 2021 Kensington Palace
I have persistently wondered whether members of the Royal Family were given the real clot shot as opposed to a saline placebo. I would, ordinarily, tend to believe not, particularly as Members of Parliament, Big Pharma employees, and independent scientists such as myself, were given automatic exemption. That said, HM The (late) Queen (1926-2022) deteriorated rapidly throughout the summer of 2022, as a consequence, I have been told, of some form of blood cancer. In the light of the recent announcement that HM The King (1948-) has also been diagnosed with cancer, I am left to wonder whether some royals were injected with the real juice after all.
The incidence of cancer, particularly fast-progressing ‘turbo’ cancer, has skyrocketed as a result of the clot shot rollout. The number of deaths among younger generations is most striking of all (Figures 252.5 & 252.6). There are, to date, three established mechanisms proving causation: (1) reduction in blood interferon concentration; (2) inhibition of cancer-suppressing genes; and (3) deliberate, and undeclared, incorporation of simian vacuolating virus (SV40) in the ‘vaccine’ vials.
Copyright © 2024 Associated Newspapers Ltd
Figure 252.6: Any doctor who is still unaware of the cause, or refuses to acknowledge it, is not worthy of the name.
Copyright © 2024 Telegraph Media Group Ltd
To all those who consider speculation, in the face of deceit, to be tasteless or offensive, I shall say this: the State is presently doing everything in its power to stop citizens exercizing their right to rational inquiry when confronted with official explanations that make no sense and thus insult the intelligent thinker. I shall leave the last word to JFK’s admirable nephew (Figure 252.7).
Figure 252.7: Why is the State so consistently fearful of the public bypassing its authority in a quest for real truth?
Copyright unknown
I maintain that HRH The Princess of Wales’s recommendation of the clot shot was damned irresponsible and might well have already led to widespread public harm. Nonetheless, rather than gloat about the possibility of HRH being hoist by her own petard, I wish her a swift and complete recovery, assuming she is still alive. Ditto HM. God Save The King.
More importantly, long live freedom of both speech and written expression.
Copyright © 2024 Paul Spradbery
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.